as you may have noticed, there are alot of people saying its a pay2win game. becouse for example a premium lvl 40 player will always win against a equaly skilled f2p lvl 40.
why we dont just seperate them? f2p can only play unranked matches, while premium only can play ranked matches. nobody can say anymore that you have a pay2win game and it will make much more fun for f2p players.
|||NO! I pay and I need to win!|||
"NO! I pay and I need to win!"
Lol
|||They wont do that because there gonna be no reason for f2p players to upgrade their account.|||oh there are reasons...|||sorry but that will never happen, do that and no edge=no reason to pay= unhappy microsoft.|||
well, maybe that would motivate them to make content which is worth the money instead of mere advantages. i did get premium, but i did it mainly for the extra units, and was disappointed to find that there is a lot less actual content than i thought. it's mostly %age boosts to units, not real content.
in short, they spent almost zero effort on making the premium content.
|||You cant seperate the two because then premium owners wouldnt have PvP until level 25 which is when you're allowed to do ranked.
People just need to deal with it or pay, its that simple. And any idiot can still lose with a premium civ, same as any smart person can win without one, having premium doesnt guarantee a win, although someone being higher level provides alot more advantages against someone whos lower but that happens with or without premium.
No comments:
Post a Comment